Dr. Rodrigo Hernández Malagón

Dr.  Rodrigo Hernández Malagón
Dr. Rodrigo Hernández Malagón

sábado, 29 de marzo de 2014

El tratamiento de las fracturas de hombro mediante prótesis centra unas jornadas del Quirón Sagrado Corazón

El tratamiento de las fracturas de hombro mediante prótesis centra unas jornadas del Quirón Sagrado Corazón

El curso ha concluido con una sesión quirúrgica dirigida por el doctor Joan Armengol, experto internacional en este ámbito

   SEVILLA, 28 Mar. (EUROPA PRESS) -

   Quirón Sagrado Corazón ha organizado las I
Jornadas de Prótesis de Hombro, centradas especialmente en el
tratamiento de las fracturas de esta articulación mediante ortopedia.
Durante la reunión se han discutido numerosos casos clínicos, y se ha
concluido con una intervención quirúrgica, a la que se ha invitado al
doctor Joan Armengol, cirujano ortopédico del Hospital de Bellvitge,
experto internacional en el manejo de este tipo de cirugías.
   Durante la sesión quirúrgica se operó a una paciente con una
luxación de prótesis parcial de hombro y se procedió a su extracción y
sustitución por una total. Según indica el doctor Bernáldez,
especialista en traumatología y ortopedia de Quirón Sagrado
Corazón-Traumainnova, "se trataba de un caso muy complejo, ya que la
paciente padecía un dolor intenso y una importante reducción funcional.
Tras sufrir una fractura compleja, se le había tratado con una prótesis
parcial que se había luxado --salido de su sitio--. Después de cuatro
horas de quirófano y tras verificar que  no existía infección, se le
cambió la parcial por una prótesis total invertida de hombro".

   La paciente se recupera de forma satisfactoria, con una movilidad
casi completa, estabilidad en todos los planos espaciales y  sin
inconvenientes. En un comunicado se indica que dos semanas después de la
intervención, si no presenta complicaciones, podrá comenzar con la
fisioterapia, anuncia el especialista.

CIRUGÍA DE PRÓTESIS DE HOMBRO

   Tras la rodilla y la cadera, el hombro es la articulación del
organismo donde más prótesis se implantan hoy en día y, porcentualmente,
la que más ha crecido en indicación y en número de implantes colocados
en la última década.

   Fundamentalmente existen dos indicaciones para las prótesis de
hombro: por causa traumática o secuelas, o lo que es lo mismo, tras una
fractura compleja (cuatro fragmentos) o conminuta (cuando el hueso queda
reducido a esquirlas) o con osteoporosis, si sospechamos que la
osteosíntesis (placas, clavos o prótesis parcial) va a salir mal o en
los casos ya operados que han fracasado (cada vez mayor indicación); o
por causa degenerativa, es decir, en aquellos casos de artrosis severa
glenohumeral (de la cabeza del húmero y la copa de la escápula), con o
sin afectación de los tendones (menor número de indicaciones pero
obtiene mejores resultados que la causa anterior).

   Los doctores Bernáldez y Cansino, ambos especialistas en
traumatología y ortopedia de Quirón Sagrado Corazón,  llevan implantadas
en la actualidad más de 50 prótesis de hombro,  con buenos resultados.
Es importante  destacar que esta intervención es una técnica compleja
que precisa de una gran  formación, pericia y curva de aprendizaje. Eso
explica que sean pocos los cirujanos que la practican en Andalucía.

TIPOS DE PRÓTESIS O ARTROPLASTIAS

   Existen tres tipos de prótesis o artroplastias: las parciales
--solo se implanta el componente humeral-, las totales --se coloca el
componente glenoideo y humeral--, y las totales invertidas, que son las
más usadas para la artropatía del manguito --aquellos casos de artrosis
con rotura masiva del manguito rotador--.

   En el caso de las prótesis totales, su forma es contraria, ya que
saca el hombro hacia fuera (offset) para suplir el manguito y permitir
la actuación  del músculo deltoides. Son las más complejas de colocar,
pero se obtienen unos resultados muy satisfactorios.

   Este tipo de cirugía se realiza bajo anestesia general y con
hipotensión controlada para que el campo sangre menos.  Al finalizar la
operación, se coloca el brazo en un cabestrillo y el paciente
permanece  uno o dos días ingresado; podrá comenzar la fisioterapia en
dos semanas. El periodo medio de incorporación a la vida normal se sitúa
entre uno y dos meses.

jueves, 27 de marzo de 2014

Management of Cannulated Screw Failure and Recurrent SCFE Displacement – Case Report

Management of Cannulated Screw Failure and Recurrent SCFE Displacement – Case Report

Management of Cannulated Screw Failure and Recurrent SCFE Displacement – Case Report

Management of Cannulated Screw Failure and Recurrent SCFE Displacement – Case Report








What to Learn from this Article?

Surgical Technique on screw removal in case of broken screw in SCFE.



Case Report |  Volume 4 | Issue 1 | JOCR Jan-Mar 2014 | Page 28-31 | Jacobson NA, Feierabend SP, Lee CL


DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.144



Authors: Jacobson NA[1], Feierabend SP[1], Lee CL[1]


Department of Orthopaedics, Wayne State University Orthopaedics.


Address of Correspondence:


Dr Nathan A.
Jacobson M.D., Wayne State University Orthopaedics, 10000 Telegraph
Road, Taylor, MI 48124. Email: njacobso@med.wayne.edu. Phone:
661-428-8567 / Fax: 313-3757226.




Abstract
Introduction: SCFE
occurs in 10 per 100,000 in some regions of the United States with the
incidence continuing to increase. Percutaneous screw fixation is a
well-accepted treatment for this disorder for over 20 years but
management of complications is not well elucidated in the literature.



Case Report: We
describe a case where a traumatic unstable SCFE that was initially
treated with closed reduction and fixation with a single transphyseal
screw went on to hardware failure with recurrence of the deformity. The
complication was successfully treated with closed reduction and re-
cannulating the fractured screw within the epiphysis and extracting it
using a conical extraction screw commonly referred to as an “easy out.”
 Three trans physeal screws were then placed for improved fixation
strength.  Follow-up at 9 months demonstrates a fused physis and no
signs of avascular necrosis of the femoral head.



Conclusion: Percutaneous
management of SCFE screw breakage is possible utilizing specialized
instruments and a precise and gentle manipulation preventing the need
for more invasive treatments with their obligatory potential
complications profile.



Keywords: Hardware Failure, Slip Recurrence, SCFE, Complication, Conical Extraction Screw, Easy Out.

Ipsilateral Fracture Shaft Femur with Neglected Dislocation of Prosthesis: A Case Report

Ipsilateral Fracture Shaft Femur with Neglected Dislocation of Prosthesis: A Case Report

Ipsilateral Fracture Shaft Femur with Neglected Dislocation of Prosthesis: A Case Report

Ipsilateral Fracture Shaft Femur with Neglected Dislocation of Prosthesis: A Case Report








What to Learn from this Article?

An unique
decision making scenario highlighting an equally important role of
surgeons skills and Patients Preferences in Clinical Decision Making.




Case Report |  Volume 3 | Issue 4 | JOCR Oct-Dec 2013 | Page 26-30 | Jain M, Bihari AJ, Sriramka


DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.127



Authors: Jain M[1], Bihari AJ[1], Sriramka[2]


[1]Department of Orthopaedics, Hitec medical college and Hospital, Rourkela, Odisha, India.


[2]Department of Anesthesia, Ispat General Hospital, Rourkela, Odisha, India.


Address of Correspondence:


Dr Mantu Jain, 347/J, Janata Colony, Gudiyari, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. India. E mail: montu_jn@yahoo.com



Abstract
Introduction: Neglected
hip dislocation is rare in today’s world and after prosthesis
replacement even rarer finding. However such patients may not report to
surgeons until they develop secondary complications. Management of such
patient’s is a challenge to the treating surgeon and need to be tailored
suiting to patient’s demands, expectations and constraints of financial
resources. We did not find a similar case in the electronic and print
media and therefore report this case which was innovatively managed.



Case Report: A
60 year farmer presented with fracture shaft femur and ipsilateral
dislocation prosthesis of right hip. He had a hemiarthroplasty done for
fracture neck of femur in the past but used to walk with a lurch since
he started to ambulate after discharge. However he was satisfied despite
“some problems” which had caused shortening of his limb. The patient
was informed of the various treatment options and their possible
complications. He expressed his inability to afford a Total Hip
Arthroplasty (THA) at any stage and consented for other options
discussed with him. The patient was positioned supine and adductor
tenotomy done. Next he was positioned laterally and the fracture was
fixed with heavy duty broad dynamic compression plate and screws. The
wound was temporarily closed. Now through the previous scar via
posterior approach the hip was exposed. The prosthesis was found to be
firmly fixed to the proximal femur. The acetabulum was cleared with
fibrous tissue. All attempts the prosthesis to relocate the prosthesis
failed after several attempts and it was best decided to leave alone.
Post operatively period was uneventful. At follow up he refused for any
further manoeuvre in future inform of heavy traction and attempts to
reduce the same. At one year when he was walking unaided and his X-rays
showed that fracture had well united his SF-36 score was PCS – 49.6 and
MCS – 51.9.



Conclusion: Ipsilateral
shaft femur fracture in chronically dislocated prosthesis, done for
fracture neck of femur is a rare clinical entity. Increased stress
transfers due to dislocation compounded with osteoporosis makes the
shaft vulnerable to fracture even with low velocity injury as in our
case. Though fixation of fracture shaft femur is clear and
straightforward; management of neglected prosthesis dislocation have to
be guided by patient’s level of expectations and subjective contentment
to adaptation to the altered hip state which influence the overall
functional outcome.



Keywords: Neglected dislocation, ipsilateral femoral fracture, hip arthroplasty.

Popliteomeniscal Fascicle Tears

http://www.healio.com/orthopedics/journals/ortho/%7B35dc91b7-8074-4f51-b43c-cdb71c4300e1%7D/popliteomeniscal-fascicle-tears

Popliteomeniscal Fascicle Tears

Tears of popliteomeniscal fascicles have been reported in high numbers of knee injuries with anterior cruciate ligament tears and injuries to the posterolateral complex.1 Yet, isolated popliteomeniscal fascicle tears are often difficult to recognize and diagnose due to the vague symptoms and often-normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and physical examination findings.2,3 These isolated injuries are often misdiagnosed and mistreated, which often leads to delayed surgical treatment. Without proper diagnosis and treatment, popliteomeniscal fascicle tears can lead to continued disability, complex tears of the lateral meniscus, which are often irreparable, and chondral lesions because of the large mobile fragment.4

The popliteomeniscal fascicles are composed of 3 distinct fasciculi, anteroinferior, posterosuperior, and posteroinferior, that attach to the lateral meniscus at the popliteal hiatus (Figure 1).5 Sussmann et al6 suggested that, embryologically, the fascicles allow vascular supply to the lateral meniscus. The fascicles are important to the controlling motion of the lateral meniscus during both flexion and extension of the knee.1,7,8 Simonian et al7 showed lateral meniscal motion doubled when the popliteomeniscal fascicles were sectioned in cadaveric knees. Kimura et al9 stated that tears of the popliteomeniscal fascicles lead to the loss of normal peripheral hoop stresses, allowing the lateral meniscus to displace medially.


Figure 1:

Sagittal T2 magnetic resonance image showing intact superior and inferior popliteomeniscal fascicles (arrows).


Injuries are often seen in the younger athletic population. These injuries are typically found in athletes who engage in sports that involve repetitive twisting, such as wrestling, dancing, and taekwondo. Mechanisms of injury can involve a single traumatic event or an insidious onset after repeated microtrauma.3,10Patients typically present with vague lateral-sided knee pain with activity. Reports of locking or giving way may or may not be present.

A standard knee examination typically does not reveal abnormalities. LaPrade and Konowalchuk3 found placing patients in a figure-4 position replicated their symptoms and was therefore useful in identifying those with popliteomeniscal fascicle tears (Figure 2).


Figure 2:

Photograph of the patient demonstrating the figure-4 position.


Isolated popliteomeniscal fascicle tears can often be difficult to detect on MRI.11A high-quality MRI with 3-mm cuts and a high index of suspicion may decrease false-negative readings. Studies by Simonian et al7 and LaPrade and Konowalchuk3 showed that 9 patients who were felt to have normal findings on MRI were found, arthroscopically, to have popliteomeniscal fascicle tears. These tears were found on MRI retrospectively. Johnson and DeSmet12 and Peduto et al13 reported that popliteomeniscal fascicles can be best evaluated on T2-weighted images in the sagittal plane.

Arthroscopic evaluation, the gold standard for diagnosis, allows for direct visualization of the popliteomeniscal fascicles at popliteal hiatus and evaluation of lateral meniscal mobility.1 LaPrade14 reported visualization of the popliteomeniscal fascicles is best done with a 30° arthroscope with the knee at neutral rotation and 20° of flexion. Simonian et al7 showed that, once visualized, the lateral meniscus must be probed to assess mobility. Thompson et al8 reported that less than half of the lateral meniscus shows mobility when the popliteomeniscal fascicles are intact. Shin et al4 proposed that when more than half of the lateral meniscus shows mobility, a popliteomeniscal fascicle tear should be suspected.

Once diagnosed arthroscopically, isolated popliteomeniscal fascicle tears should be surgically repaired to prevent further disability. In the short term, a hypermobile meniscus leads to further intrinsic meniscal damage, which decreases healing rates, as well as chondral damage from abnormal wear and tear. Long term, if untreated, a hypermobile meniscus will require a “functional” complete lateral meniscectomy, meaning the beginning of the end to the lateral compartment. Several techniques have been described for repair. LaPrade nd Konowalchuk3 described open repair of the lateral meniscus back to the popliteomeniscal fascicles and popliteus tendon complex. The results were reported for 6 patients. All returned to unrestricted activity with resolution of symptoms with an average 3.8-year follow-up. Simonian et al7 reported resolution of symptoms in 3 patients with an inside-out repair technique. After repair, most patients are allowed to return to athletic activity at 4 months.

Case Reports

Patient 1

A 14-year-old female competitive dancer presented reporting lateral-sided knee pain and locking and catching of her right knee for 3 years. Initially, the locking and catching occurred every few months; it had been increasing in frequency. She stated that once her knee was at 90° of flexion, it would lock. She was unable to extend it and had to release it by going into deep flexion with a twist of the knee. Once this had occurred, her knee would swell for 2 days. She reported no inciting event. An examination revealed no effusion, knee range of motion of 0° to 150°, no patellofemoral symptoms, and stable ligamentous findings. Passively, the locking and catching could not be reproduced. She did have pain on the lateral joint line on McMurray examination. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed increased signal at the lateral meniscus and a tear of the popliteomeniscal fascicles (Figure 3).


Figure 3:

Sagittal T2 magnetic resonance image showing torn superior and inferior popliteomeniscal fascicles.


The patient was taken to the operating room, where diagnostic arthroscopy revealed a tear of the popliteomeniscal fascicles and increased mobility of the lateral meniscus (Figure 4). An inside-out meniscal repair was performed from the 9 to 11 o’clock position. A total of five 2-0 Ethibond (Ethicon, Somerville, New Jersey) sutures were placed (Figure 5). Postoperatively, the patient was toe-touch weight bearing in 30° of flexion. She was started on physical therapy postoperative day 3 working on knee range of motion of 0° to 90°. At 1 month postoperatively, the patient was allowed to weight bear with the knee brace locked in extension. Therapy continued with range of motion of 0° to 90° with quadriceps strengthening from 0° to 45°. Two months postoperatively, the knee brace was unlocked and therapy continued with quadriceps strengthening of 0° to 90°. At 3 months, the brace was discontinued and she was allowed to start plyometrics. Four months postoperatively, the patient did not report pain or locking in her knee with plyometric exercises. A functional evaluation test revealed only a 1.8% deficit. The patient was allowed to start sport-specific activity without restrictions and gradual return to full dance training.


Figure 4:

Intraoperative arthroscopic lateral compartment image showing a hypermobile lateral meniscus (Patient 1).



Figure 5:

Intraoperative arthroscopic lateral compartment image after inside-out lateral meniscal repair (Patient 1).


Patient 2

A 15-year-old female multisport athlete felt a pop in her right knee after sliding into a base. She presented reporting recurrent locking symptoms in her knee for 9 months. Magnetic resonance imaging showed tears of the popliteomeniscal fascicles and lateral meniscus. Arthroscopic evaluation showed a hypermobility of the lateral meniscus (Figure 6). An inside-out lateral meniscus repair with a fibrin clot was performed (Figure 7).


Figure 6:

Intraoperative arthroscopic lateral compartment image showing hypermobility of the lateral meniscus (Patient 2).



Figure 7:

Intraoperative arthroscopic lateral compartment image showing inside-out repair with a blood clot (Patient 2).


The patient returned to athletic activity. Nine months postoperatively, when squatting to pick up a basketball, she again felt a pop in her knee and presented with a locked knee. Magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic evaluation showed a re-tear of the lateral meniscus. A revision inside-out lateral meniscus repair with fibrin clot augmentation was performed. Seven months postoperatively, the patient again re-injured her knee during a collision while playing soccer. The patient had immediate swelling and limited knee extension. Diagnostic arthroscopy again revealed an unhealed re-torn lateral meniscus (Figure 8). At this point, a partial lateral meniscectomy was performed. The patient has since returned to athletic activity with a narrowed lateral joint line (Figure 9). This case illustrates the effects of late treatment for popliteomeniscal fascicle tears.


Figure 8:

Intraoperative arthroscopic lateral compartment image of a re-torn and unhealed lateral meniscus (Patient 2).



Figure 9:

Postoperative anteroposterior weight-bearing radiograph showing the right knee lateral joint space (Patient 2).


Conclusion

Isolated popliteomeniscal fascicle tears are often difficult to diagnose. Symptoms of vague lateral knee pain with or without locking should heighten one’s suspicion for a possible popliteomeniscal fascicle tear. Arthroscopic evaluation of the popliteomeniscal fascicles and mobility of the lateral meniscus provides the best diagnostic study for isolated tears. Surgical stabilization of the lateral meniscus must be performed for resolution of symptoms, preservation of the lateral compartment, and return to previous activity.

References
Staubli H, Rauschning W. Popliteus tendon and its fascicles at the popliteal hiatus: gross anatomy and functional arthroscopic evaluation with and without anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Arthroscopy. 1990; 6:209–220. doi:10.1016/0749-8063(90)90077-Q [CrossRef]
Kimura M, Shirakura K, Hasegawa A, Kobayashi Y, Udagawa E. Anatomy and pathophysiology of the popliteal tendon area in the lateral meniscus: Part 1. Arthroscopic and anatomical investigation. Arthroscopy. 1992; 8:419–423. doi:10.1016/0749-8063(92)90001-R [CrossRef]
LaPrade RF, Konowalchuk BK. Popliteomeniscal fascicle tears causing symptomatic lateral compartment knee pain: diagnosis by the figure-4 test and treatment by open repair. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33(8):1231–1236. doi:10.1177/0363546504274144 [CrossRef]
Shin HK, Lee HS, Lee YK, et al. Popliteomeniscal fascicle tear: diagnosis and operative technique. Arthroscopy Techniques. 2012; 1:101–106. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2012.04.004 [CrossRef]
Cohn A, Mains D. Popliteal hiatus of the lateral meniscus and measurement at dissection of 10 specimens. Am J Sports Med. 1979; 7:221–226. doi:10.1177/036354657900700402 [CrossRef]
Sussmann PS, Simonian PT, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Development of the popliteomeniscal fasciculi in the fetal human knee joint. Arthroscopy. 1990; 17:14–18. doi:10.1053/jars.2001.19653 [CrossRef]
Simonian PT, Simonian PS, van Thrommel M, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Popliteomeniscal fasciculi and lateral meniscal stability. Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25:849–853. doi:10.1177/036354659702500620 [CrossRef]
Thompson WO, Thaete FL, Fu FH, et al. Tibial meniscal dynamics using three-dimensional reconstruction of the magnetic resonance images. Am J Sports Med. 1991: 19:210–216. doi:10.1177/036354659101900302[CrossRef]
Kimura M, Shirakura K, Hasegawa A, Kobayashi Y, Udagawa E. Anatomy and pathophysiology of the popliteal tendon area in the lateral meniscus: 2. Clinical investigation. Arthroscopy. 1992; 8:424–427. doi:10.1016/0749-8063(92)90002-S [CrossRef]
Park JH, Ro KH, Lee DH. Snapping knee caused by a popliteomeniscal fascicle tear of the lateral meniscus in a professional taekwondo athlete. Orthopedics. 2012; 7:1104–1107. doi:10.3928/01477447-20120621-31 [CrossRef]
Sakai H, Sasho T, Wada Y, et al. MRI of the popliteomeniscal fasciculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186:446–466. doi:10.2214/AJR.04.0068 [CrossRef]
Johnson RL, DeSmet AA. MR visualization of the popliteomeniscal fascicles.Skeletal Radiol. 1999; 28:561–566. doi:10.1007/s002560050619 [CrossRef]
Peduto AJ, Nguyen A, Trudell DJ, Resnick DL. Popliteomeniscal fascicles: anatomic considerations using MR arthrography in cadavers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190:442–448. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2643 [CrossRef]
LaPrade RF. Arthroscopic evaluation of the lateral compartment knees with grade 3 posterolateral knee complex injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25:596–602. doi:10.1177/036354659702500502 [CrossRef]

martes, 25 de marzo de 2014

Los norteamericanos, pensando que solo existen ellos.... / List of the Top 22 Knee Surgeons in North America

Los efectos del cambio de peso en la articulación de la rodilla

http://www.condroprotectores.es/los-efectos-del-cambio-de-peso-en-la-articulacion-de-la-rodilla/

Los efectos del cambio de peso en la articulación de la rodilla

Un estudio publicado recientemente en la revista Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases analiza la relación entre los cambios de peso y los cambios del volumen del cartílago tibial en adultos obesos.
Para ello se estudiaron 112 personas obesas (con un IMC superior a 30kg/m2) de distintas comunidades. El volumen de su cartílago tibial se midió mediante IRM y sus síntomas de rodilla mediante el índice WOMAC, recogiéndose datos durante una media de 2,3 años.
A través de una pérdida de peso moderada se observó una relación entre el cambio de peso porcentual y el volumen del cartílago tibial medio, aunque no se asociaron cambios en el volumen del cartílago tibial lateral o en la rótula. La pérdida de peso también se asoció a cambios en las subescalas WOMAC de dolor, rigidez y función.
obesidad_artrosis
Fotografía de Tony Alter
Los resultados del estudio implican un efecto lineal entre la pérdida de peso que se asocia con una reducción de la pérdida del volumen del cartílago medial, además de una mejora de los síntomas de la rodilla; lo que significaría que las personas obesas pueden conseguir índices de mejora mediante pequeñas diferencias en el peso corporal, tanto en la estructura de la rodilla como en los síntomas. El estudio destaca que la pérdida de peso es un factor importante en el manejo de la artrosis de pacientes obesos, pero que además el evitar que estos pacientes vuelvan a ganar peso más tarde debería de ser una prioridad clínica.

sábado, 22 de marzo de 2014

Discusión entre pares / Operated Outside ...


Operated Outside ... 



  • Alok Singh Whats this

  • Swetal Bhavsar probably he might have tried to drill proximal screw. drill bit broken... so bent the guide wire 

  • Sharma Pervaind 1st reaction wats dis??????????????

  • Pavan Patil Good on table innovation

  • Rajendra Prasad presence of mind in absence of good luck.

  • Pritish Singh My only worry is-is guide wire made of 316L or any biocompatible metal?And if not-can that lead to any problem later?

  • Ramesh Kumar Gupta Nice post,

  • Venkatesh Gupta But why he left guide wire in-situ?!...

  • Swetal Bhavsar Battery Action , Rusting anything anytime

  • Swetal Bhavsar We shall not laugh at Surgeon. He is a victim of Local Implants Manufacturers dirty production... 

  • Rakesh Kumar Raju Superb , when things go against you innovation comes out . Kudos to the surgeon .

  • Santosh Mahapatra Its not a drillbit.. its something else!!!

  • Tanay Sharma Is it broken screw guys

  • Jayant Sharma Accidents do happen with everyone in orthopaedics

  • Santosh Mahapatra Oh.... I got it.... its a broken screw with the guide wire inside...... one cant bent the drill... it is the guidewire which is bent.... really appreciate the creativity....

  • Satya Ranjan Patra Managed the mess well....

  • Tanay Sharma Hats off to surgeon he tried to remove it but as it went through screw was left there

  • Tanay Sharma Good presence of mind

  • Tanay Sharma The surgeon to remove this will have tough time

  • Ramesh Kumar Gupta Why has he bent guide wire? Is it to give more strength? He could remove the wire.

  • Drsachin Phadnis it seems that due to broken drill bit surgeon has attempted fixation with K wire ( Jugad )

  • Anand Patel Guide wire may be left probably for anti-rotation purpose.

  • Manav Luthra innovation

  • Swapnil Nalge artist

  • Mehul Lohana the broken cannulated threaded screw with guide wire in insitu ..

  • Sandeep Adavaram common intra operative complication....surgeon is helpless

  • Rajendra Prasad I think he left guide wire with broken drill bit and kept it with bent tip was his future plannig to remove the broken drill bit during implant removal.if he had removed guide wire during fixation then it would have been very difficult to remove broken drill bit on later date.

  • Pritish Singh I agree.And whoever the surgeon was, did an intelligent job- patient must have migrated on seeing post op x ray but we all will face this one day courtesy non monitored implants manufacturing in India. Indian-Orthopaedic Research-Group??

  • Rishi Sanghavi Nice done but I am nor sure how is it going 2 help. I would suggest once u break drill bit remove wire and just give 10 to 15 degree ant or post tilt and pass a new guide wire ant or post to broken drill and gentally drill again inder iitv. Make sure u dont push old broken drillbit piece and put screw just ant or post to ur broken screw or drillbit

  • Rishi Sanghavi Indian implants may lead u in such situations so always keep in mind that once ur half at neck level check under iitv and I usually remove guide pin in young individuals as they have very strong bone and under iitv cont drilling. After that again put ur guidepin and over which put ur screw in exact position. In this way u can avoid breaking of wires. And it takes hardly 5min more in ur surgery

  • Swetal Bhavsar The best way is stop doing Trauma... Do TKR THR or only cold surgeries 

  • Mehul Lohana earn money not complications